The Importanec of a Core Knoweldge Remains Key How to Lift Weights to Lose Weight
Breaking News Agency
 
Google
 
:: News ::

The Importanec of a Core Knoweldge Remains Key

Sun, 4 Mar 2007

Colleges may despise the idea of standardization, but for years they have essentially embraced it anyway. The so-called standard curriculum, devised in 1917, may no longer require two hours a week of Bible class, but the idea of core knowledge remains.

The distribution system, which requires students to learn some history, say, even if they are studying science and some English even if they want to become engineers, goes back to the time when college was seen not juts as a training ground for workers but also as a producer of learned gentlemen. Even as universtiies became more specialized, they worked toward a common culture. But by the 1970s, the core curriculum was being criticized as too western, too white, and too male. Brown University, as just one example, had scrapped the general education requireemnt altogether. But most colleges simply added more diversity to the list of Things Every College Kid Should Know. García Márquez now shared the syllabus with Marx.

Disagreement on core curriculum remains. But educators can generally agree that students should leave college with proficiency in the following areas: critical thinking, logical reasoning, computation, at least one foreign language, appreciation for diverse cultures, and spaeking and writing. If they come away with those skills—and some lasting friendships—the college coudl be considered to have done its job.

This story appears in the March 12, 2007 print edition of U.S. News & World Report.